This is the official blog of ex-Sgt Ellie Bloggs. I was a real live police constable then sergeant for twelve years, on the real live front line of England. I'm now a real live non-police person. All the facts I recount are true, and are not secrets. If they don't want me blogging about it, they shouldn't do it. PS If you don't pay tax, you don't (or didn't) pay my salary.

(All proceeds from Google Ads will be donated to the Police Roll of Honour Trust)

Friday, October 03, 2008

Excuse me, sir, are you a nonce?

If you enter Telford Town Park without a child, be prepared to be asked to account for your behaviour. Park wardens will be trying to keep paedophiles out with this sanction.

Blandshire Constabulary adopts a MULTI-AGENCY APPROACH to paedophilia. The Multi-Agency Approach is a handy modern tool and can be applied to virtually any problem. It essentially means that instead of just the police getting upset when nasty paedos do nasty paedo things, a lot of other people get upset too, and get paid to do so.

Blandshire Constabulary's own contribution to public safety is the Bad Man Officer, who sits upstairs in the Public Protection Unit. Her job is to keep tabs on all convicted sex offenders prowling the area. She knows* their registered addresses, what offences they have committed, what their likelihood of reoffending is. It is also her job to discover if they are evincing worrying behaviour that might suggest they are about to reoffend. One such symptom might be if they kidnap and rape a three-year-old.

*When I say "she knows", this means she can log onto a lot of systems to get this information. So can any normal police officer.

One of the BMO's most important roles is to apply for Orders against sex offenders who seem to be about to reoffend. The Order, vitally, makes it illegal for the subject to commit an illegal sex offence.

Following Telford Council's decision to quiz innocent passers-by on their predilection for children, pond life, squirrels and/or swans, there's been some discussion in the media about how large a threat paedophiles really pose. Some pundits aren't sure if society is really at greater risk from paedophiles than in the past (you might argue less, because it's harder to get away with it nowadays). Others point out that this policy is in fact ENCOURAGING the kidnap of children, so that people who don't have any can borrow some to go to the park with.

I've dealt with two or three really nasty stranger paedophile incidents during my service. I've seen hundreds of nasty non-stranger, inter-familial child abuse cases. So how is quizzing people who don't have children going to protect them, again...?

Incidentally, my favourite bit of the Mail article is where outraged Miss Whittaker, 34, has her say on this disgraceful policy. No, she is not upset about the infringement on human freedoms or the wrongful labelling of innocent adults as potential sex offenders, but about the "dangerous implication that if you have a child with you than everything is OK and you won't be questioned". Clearly Miss Whittaker feels that all people, whether with a child or not, are suspected paedophiles.

NB Is this the same Miss Whittaker who was thrown out of the park for dressing as a penguin the month before? If so, perhaps her remarks above have been taken out of context.

Why is this man in Telford Town Park? I
s he a paedophile?

I should add, I have no idea who this man is. But NOR DO YOU.

'Diary of an On-Call Girl' is available in some bookstores and online.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

On ITV's Tonight programme on Friday evening, they did a filmed, controlled "experiment" with 2 child actors, who pretended to be lost in a busy shopping centre. The results were quite a shock and proved just how damaging all the PC nonsense of so called "child protection" really is.

Government have taken it too far and are damaging children and society with the system, which NuLab has tinkered with to cover the backsides of staff who have ANYTHING to do with children, who they cannot even touch to help or comfort them when hurt, or in distress. It is perverse madness.

The two child actors in the shopping centre on the Tonight programme, appearing to be lost and in distress were IGNORED by the vast majority of adults, who just walked on by. Those who had the natural instinct to help a child in distress were in the minority. The public have become paranoid of even TALKING to children, for fear of being regarded in a suspicious, negative light and accused of being a "nonce".

Children are suffering as a result of this over the top PC witch hunt, which automatically assumes that ALL adults pose a potential danger to ALL children. Esther Rantzen said she blames herself for this problem, because of her media campaign in 1986. She shouldn't blame herself for the fact of government abusing its powers and TWISTING, what was intended to be a safety net system to protect kids from SERIOUS ABUSE.

If anyone is to be "blamed" for this mess, it is the politicians and NOT the person who wrote the letter, which instigated the whole "child protection" concept, which Esther Rantzen championed over 20 years ago.


04 October, 2008 02:12

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The council has released further information about the policy:

"I want to categorically state that it has never been this council’s policy to stop, question and turn away adults without youngsters in the play areas in the Town Park. Such a policy defies common sense and I will not let this happen. - Telford council boss Andrew Eade

04 October, 2008 07:31

Anonymous The Windsor Swindler said...

Look, it's really quite simple - take a lesson from recent history. The certified nonces should have to walk around with a large red star on their foreheads, while the mere suspects should wear a yellow one. Then there'd be no awkward questions to ask, eh?!

It's so simple, I can't think why nobody in this green and pleasant land has thought of it before.

04 October, 2008 11:36

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Loved the notion that someone can apply for an order to prevent a crime taking place. Roll on Kafka

04 October, 2008 17:17

Anonymous Auntie Jane said...

I must say it can be risky for an MOP to talk to a child. I wouldn't unless the mother is present.

Children are sometimes attracted to me because I generally have a couple of attractive friendly dogs with me. But I still look round for a parent...

I didn't see the TV programme mentioned by 'anon'. But I would have spoken to the children if they appeared distressed, but I would be dialing 999 as I did.

04 October, 2008 17:47

Anonymous MarjUK said...

As there is no evidence of an increase in the rate of child abduction by strangers in the last 50 years (and I'm about the same age as Brady's and Hindley's victims would be if they'd survived), why is there so much fuss? Sure, one child abused is one too many, but it does not justify the paranoia.

I'm afraid my second word to a Telford parkie would be "off" (unless my first two were "You can").

To carry out my voluntary work (as a Community First Responder) I have to have an enhanced CRB check every so often. Do I have to carry a copy with me if I should decide to go for a walk in a Telford park? Is the parkie's CRB the bog standard or the enhanced check?

04 October, 2008 23:33

Anonymous The Real Thing said...

I live near to Telford give 20 mile or so, but I dont go there. Nor do I talk to children, women, police officers, council housing officers, the check-out girl at Morrisons, the ginger tom down the road or Jack Russell terriers. You never know. Actually its best not to look at or talk to anything that moves in the UK anymore. I now also find that I have to keep in my wardrobe a new set of practical work clothing. Five T-shirts to be exact. They are all bright yellow and proudly proclaim 'I am a photographer, not a terrorist' Its just the world we live in.

05 October, 2008 00:27

Anonymous Dr Melvin T Gray said...

By way of a 'minor' contribution to this Kafkaesque, Blandford should employ a Bad Woman Officer to monitor all female drivers known to suffer from spatial disorientation, thus preventing menaces from 'driving' into Town.

05 October, 2008 10:29

Blogger uniform said...

Isn't that picture of the Wrekin beardy weirdo set the local branch of

"A small Huddersfield group concerned with promoting equality, justice and the preservation of civil liberty"

they are indeed "local people"

05 October, 2008 19:53

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I doubt it. You can be sure that it is not a 'peeping' coward hiding behind a uniform.

05 October, 2008 20:19

Blogger Kenny O said...

hey love your blog...
I am a new police officer herein canada.. would love to link our blogs?

06 October, 2008 03:41

Anonymous Anonymous said...

UNIFORM is transfixed insulting Dr melvin at the expense of posting something on topic. In my days of service I don't recall one occasion when we were concerned about a guy standing in the local elections with civil liberty issues. You sure you are in uniform, Uniform?

Ex Inspector

06 October, 2008 05:11

Anonymous Dr Melvin T Gray said...

Dear Uniform,
Accept my belated thanks for all your kind comments.

Failure to extend this courtesy earlier is entirely due to that awkward feeling one experiences when talking to the ventriloquist whilst looking at the dummy.

Your contention that I stood in the last local elections and drew 65 votes in Almondbury, is true. I am obliged by such lean times to pawn my rosette.

06 October, 2008 08:43

Anonymous mac said...

My impression is that this was one parkie acting on their own 'initiative', judging by the council exec's comments (although he wouldn't be the first boss to run a mile and leave the 'operative' out to dry).

But that's how bad things have got. Now numerous people in various positions of authority don't know what's legal and what isn't and in this litigious society they err on the side of caution. Hence various weird rules about no cameras as sports days, christmas plays etc. Otherwise normal, sensible people make these decisions but lose all reason when it comes to nonces. Throw in a few of teh nutter like Ms Whitakker and all the closet, behind closed doors, related nonces get away with it.

The irony is that a young distressed child who had just escaped from the clutches of a paedophile would probably be ignored by 90% of the public.

06 October, 2008 12:20

Blogger Beattie said...

I know there are serious issues here, but

'squirrels and/or swans'

has just made me laugh so much that there is now tea all over the place.

Thanks PCB

06 October, 2008 15:25

Blogger Area Trace No Search said...

Do uniformed coppers get questioned on entering the park I wonder?

After all, they probably won't be bringing children with them. And of course, ANYONE can be a peado.
In fact, there's probably one BEHIND YOU RIGHT NOW!


06 October, 2008 16:00

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I recently saw a local authority park ranger, dressed in black one piece coveralls complete with utility belt and overhanging beergut, `modular` waistcoat with all sorts of useful kit attached thereto (as per SAS/police tac firearms seige-busting fatigues), pilot style RayBan shades, Hi Tech Magnum boots, fingerless leather gloves and a sherrifs badge embossed with the words "Mounted Ranger". As I approached my parked car, keys at the ready, he cast me a sideways glance. All I could bring myself to say to him was, "Please don't shoot me". Good job I didn't look like a possible nonce as I was wearing a dark blue suit, shirt and tie. Perhaps it was just the bag of sweets that put me in the frame?

06 October, 2008 16:04

Blogger Kenny O said...

Thanks for dropping into my blog... I live in Halifax but will be working across the bridge in Dartmouth,,, Again thanks and I'll be adding a link to your blog..

06 October, 2008 16:50

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I made dozens of friends in the park, 3 dogs and 30 yrs. When the old fellow died last year, I thought how could I walk round the park without hound and seem normal, I know. I bought a bike, and no one looks twice at me, phweeo.

06 October, 2008 20:23

Blogger staghounds said...

Reminds me of the ol;d hotel detective joke-


"Do you have a woman in there?"


"Do you want one?"

06 October, 2008 22:52

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't always agree with you but two very good posts, particularly this last one.

08 October, 2008 16:15

Anonymous xoggoth said...

Just going from experiences others have told me about including members of my family (all fairly minor but still) this problem has always been around, we are just more aware of it.

08 October, 2008 16:53

Anonymous Chad said...

Seems to be lost. maybe off meds.

08 November, 2008 15:12

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The picture of the person you have is myself, John Frankly and I am the owner of

I note that you never displayed the other pictures that were in the Shropshire Star of other adults all who attended the same demo.

I was in the Town Park with my children after arranging a demostration about the polict that never actually existed.

Somethings developed after this, like the cabinet member who got sacked over this non existant policy.

It is also worth noting that the council allow 25 organisations to work with young people in the town park, yet hold NO crb or list 99 check information on them.


Because it is their policy.

They worry about residents, yet allow others to work with young people unchecked.

16 November, 2008 18:27

Anonymous Anonymous said...

成人電影,情色,本土自拍, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友, 本土自拍, 免費A片下載, 性愛,
成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 美女交友,

嘟嘟成人網, 成人貼圖, 成人電影, A片, 豆豆聊天室, 聊天室, UT聊天室, 尋夢園聊天室, 男同志聊天室, UT男同志聊天室, 聊天室尋夢園, 080聊天室, 080苗栗人聊天室, 6K聊天室, 女同志聊天室, 小高聊天室, 情色論壇, 色情網站, 成人網站, 成人論壇, 免費A片, 上班族聊天室, 成人聊天室, 成人小說, 微風成人區, 色美媚部落格, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人論壇, 情色聊天室, 寄情築園小遊戲, AV女優,成人電影,情色,本土自拍, A片下載, 日本A片, 麗的色遊戲, 色色網, ,嘟嘟情人色網, 色情網站, 成人網站, 正妹牆, 正妹百人斬, aio,伊莉, 伊莉討論區, 成人遊戲, 成人影城,
ut聊天室, 免費A片, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片,

愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, aV, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片,成人電影,情色,本土自拍,

03 April, 2009 21:40

Anonymous Anonymous said...

免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,

情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友,

15 April, 2009 04:45

Anonymous Anonymous said...

爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性, 做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇,

免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片,

aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真,

15 April, 2009 12:55


Post a Comment

<< Home


View My Stats
eXTReMe Tracker